Citewake

Edition 2

Endpoint protection: what AI recommends, Citewake Edition 2 (collected 29–30 Oct 2026)

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint was the brand the four AIs recommended most often: in 41.3% of decision answers (90% interval 31.9–50.7), followed by CrowdStrike Falcon (39.9%) and SentinelOne Singularity (25.3%). The AIs disagreed: Claude recommended Microsoft Defender for Endpoint in 48.5% of its decision answers, Perplexity in 31.7%; the widest gap among the top 15 was SentinelOne Singularity, 37.0 points between Gemini and Perplexity. The figures come from 240 valid answers of 240 planned, to 60 questions asked once of each AI between 29 and 30 October 2026, which named 281 brands in all.

Published
Method
v0.9
Benchmark
v1
Version
1
Category
Every edition
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23792163

Download the report (PDF)DataCite

1Leaderboard

Top 15 brands by recommendation rate, Endpoint protection, collected 29–30 Oct 2026. Percent of decision answers, with 90% interval, overall and per AI.
#BrandRecommendation rate % (90% interval)ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity
1Microsoft Defender for Endpoint41.3 (31.9–50.7)41.248.544.031.7
2CrowdStrike Falcon39.9 (30.7–48.9)32.049.151.527.1
3SentinelOne Singularity25.3 (18.6–32.5)12.336.844.57.5
4Bitdefender GravityZone23.6 (17.3–30.3)12.841.829.810.1
5Microsoft Defender for Business18.6 (11.1–27.1)22.514.817.419.8
6SentinelOne18.4 (12.8–24.4)12.424.731.74.8
7Sophos16.1 (11.1–21.4)10.124.914.614.8
8Huntress14.8 (9.8–20.5)0.027.329.52.6
9Sophos Intercept X12.4 (7.4–18.0)0.019.619.810.3
10ESET PROTECT12.4 (8.2–17.1)5.027.19.97.5
11Palo Alto Networks11.8 (6.1–18.1)5.119.812.310.1
12CrowdStrike10.4 (6.2–15.5)7.317.012.45.0
13Huntress Managed EDR9.2 (5.0–13.9)12.19.97.57.3
14Microsoft Defender7.5 (3.6–11.9)2.612.612.42.6
15ESET6.2 (2.2–10.6)7.312.42.62.4

Percent of decision answers in which each AI recommended the brand, top 15 of 281. Overall rate with its 90% interval; the bar draws the interval on a 0–100% scale. Shown to one decimal; the data files carry four.

2Where the AIs disagree

Among the top 15, the brands with the largest gap between the AI that recommended them most and the AI that recommended them least.

Brands among the top 15 with the largest gap between AIs.
BrandHighestLowestGap (points)
SentinelOne SingularityGemini 44.5%Perplexity 7.5%37.0
Bitdefender GravityZoneClaude 41.8%Perplexity 10.1%31.7
HuntressGemini 29.5%ChatGPT 0.0%29.5
SentinelOneGemini 31.7%Perplexity 4.8%26.9
CrowdStrike FalconGemini 51.5%Perplexity 27.1%24.4

3How each AI answers

How each AI answers: medians per answer, and how many answers searched the web.
Per answer, medianChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexity
Searched the web60 of 6060 of 6039 of 6060 of 60
Searches per answer4233
Pages found36.5181015
Pages cited36104
Brands named3762.5
Brands recommended2.5652
Words per answer226.5448497.5194

Gemini answered 21 of 60 questions without running any web search. That is the model Citewake asked, gemini-3.1-flash-lite, through its API with search available. Across all four AIs, 698 searches were run; 31.2% of them included a year. Every page Gemini reported was one it cited, so its pages found and cited match.

4The sites the AIs cite

The ten domains cited in the most answers.
#DomainAnswers citing itShare
1learn.microsoft.com6326.3%
2huntress.com3514.6%
3sentinelone.com3414.2%
4microsoft.com3313.8%
5crowdstrike.com3213.3%
6acronis.com2510.4%
7cynet.com2410.0%
8cisa.gov218.8%
9paloaltonetworks.com208.3%
10sophos.com197.9%

ChatGPT

  1. learn.microsoft.com56.7%
  2. crowdstrike.com16.7%
  3. cisa.gov15.0%
  4. sentinelone.com11.7%
  5. sophos.com11.7%

Claude

  1. cybersecuritynews.com15.0%
  2. expertinsights.com15.0%
  3. sentinelone.com15.0%
  4. crowdstrike.com13.3%
  5. huntress.com13.3%

Gemini

  1. cynet.com35.0%
  2. huntress.com35.0%
  3. acronis.com30.0%
  4. sentinelone.com26.7%
  5. paloaltonetworks.com25.0%

Perplexity

  1. learn.microsoft.com41.7%
  2. microsoft.com25.0%
  3. cisa.gov18.3%
  4. crowdstrike.com18.3%
  5. av-comparatives.org8.3%

Share of the 240 answers whose cited pages include the domain: top ten overall, then the top five within each AI's own 60 answers.

5Agreement

On 40 of the 60 questions all four AIs recommended a brand first; they named the same brand first on 5.

6Method in brief

  • Questions. 60 scored questions in three tiers (head, mid, tail), written as a buyer would ask them and never naming a brand: 41 decision questions and 18 informational. See the list. A further 15 validation questions are kept private.
  • Asking. Each question was asked once of each AI through its official API, with its own web search on and no location sent. Models: ChatGPT: gpt-6-luna; Claude: claude-haiku-5-5; Gemini: gemini-3.1-flash-lite; Perplexity: perplexity/sonar.
  • Collection. 29 October 2026, 13:57 – 30 October 2026, 04:18 UTC. 240 valid answers of 240 planned: 200 named at least one brand, 40 named none.
  • Reading. One grand master model (Claude Opus 5.5) read the four answers to each question side by side and marked each brand as recommended, mentioned or negative. A brand counts only if its name appears word for word in the answer.
  • Measure. Recommendation rate is the share of decision answers in which the AI recommended the brand. The overall rate weights each AI and each tier equally, so it can differ slightly from a raw count. Intervals are 90%, from a cluster bootstrap that resamples whole questions. Here the base is 164 decision answers (41 decision questions, 41 answers from each AI). One popularity question (which brand is most used, not which to choose) is reported apart and never counted in the recommendation rate.
  • Method. v0.9, benchmark v1, scoring run 20261030T055048314Z. The full method: citewake.com/methodology.

7Limitations

  • One run. Each question was asked once of each AI, in one window of 14 hours 21 minutes. AI answers vary from run to run; the intervals cover variation across questions, not repeat runs.
  • English, no market. Questions were in English and no location was sent, so the results describe no particular country.
  • Spellings merged. orcasecurity was counted as Orca Security.
  • Benchmark figures, not market share. These are benchmark visibility figures across a fixed bank of questions with equal weight per tier, not estimates of market share.
  • Top picks are rare. Most answers do not name a single best choice. Even Microsoft Defender for Endpoint was the top pick in only 1.2% of decision answers, so this report ranks by recommendation rate.

8Disclosure

Citewake is operated by the team that also builds aipozi, Biotree and livedot. Biotree and livedot appear in these categories. They were measured by the same method as every other brand, with no adjustment. None of them was named in this category.

9The questions

Each question links to its page, with the four answers in full, the brands read from them and the pages they cited.

All 60 scored questions, with tier and type
IDQuestionTierType
h01What's the best endpoint protection for a business?headdecision
h02Which endpoint protection is best for a small business?headdecision
h03What are the main endpoint protection platforms and how do they compare?headdecision
h04How much does endpoint protection cost per device?headinformational
h05Which endpoint protection is best at stopping ransomware?headdecision
h06What's the difference between antivirus and endpoint detection and response?headinformational
h07Which endpoint protection platforms are most widely used by companies?headdecision (popularity)
h08What's the best endpoint protection for a large enterprise?headdecision
h09Which endpoint protection should a startup put on its laptops?headdecision
h10Which endpoint protection is best for a managed service provider looking after many clients?headdecision
h11How do I choose endpoint protection for my company?headinformational
h12Which endpoint protection works best across laptops and servers running different operating systems?headdecision
h13Which endpoint protection gives a company the most protection for the money?headdecision
h14Which endpoint protection is easiest for a small IT team to manage?headdecision
h15Which endpoint protection detects the most attacks with the fewest false alarms?headinformational
h16What's the best endpoint protection for servers?headdecision
h17Does a company still need endpoint protection if its staff work mostly in cloud apps?headinformational
h18Which endpoint protection best protects the laptops of a fully remote team?headdecision
h19Which endpoint protection slows computers down the least?headdecision
h20Is there free endpoint protection good enough for a small company?headinformational
m01Endpoint protection with a round-the-clock managed detection team for a company with no security staffmiddecision
m02Endpoint protection a managed service provider can run for dozens of clients from one consolemiddecision
m03Endpoint protection that produces the device coverage and alert-response reports a SaaS company's SOC 2 auditor asks formiddecision
m04Most affordable endpoint protection for a company of fifty peoplemiddecision
m05Endpoint protection for a financial services firm under strict regulatory oversightmiddecision
m06Is the protection built into a computer's operating system enough for a company, or does it need a separate product?midinformational
m07How do I switch endpoint protection vendors across hundreds of laptops without leaving gaps?midinformational
m08Endpoint protection for a company where staff use their own laptopsmiddecision
m09Endpoint protection for a healthcare provider whose machines hold patient recordsmiddecision
m10Endpoint protection for servers and workloads running in the cloudmiddecision
m11Should a 200-person company run endpoint detection itself or pay for a managed service?midinformational
m12Endpoint protection for a manufacturer with old computers running factory equipmentmiddecision
m13Endpoint protection priced per device rather than per usermiddecision
m14Endpoint detection and response that satisfies a cyber insurer's requirementsmidinformational
m15Endpoint protection for an agency whose staff run heavy design and video softwaremiddecision
m16Alternatives to the large endpoint security suites for a mid-sized companymiddecision
m17When does a company outgrow basic antivirus and need endpoint detection and response?midinformational
m18Endpoint protection for a university with thousands of shared computersmiddecision
m19Endpoint protection for machines that are often offline, such as at remote sitesmiddecision
m20What should a small IT team do when endpoint protection flags an attack on a laptop?midinformational
t01Endpoint protection that can roll back files encrypted by ransomwaretaildecision
t02Endpoint protection that can cut an infected laptop off the network remotely in one steptaildecision
t03Endpoint detection tool that lets analysts search every device's history for signs of an attacktaildecision
t04How do I cut false alarms from endpoint detection without missing real attacks?tailinformational
t05Endpoint protection that attackers and staff can't switch off on the devicetaildecision
t06Endpoint protection that blocks unapproved USB drivestaildecision
t07Endpoint protection with an API that feeds alerts into our own security toolstaildecision
t08Endpoint protection that lets only approved software run on locked-down machinestaildecision
t09How do I deploy endpoint protection to the laptops of staff who never come into the office?tailinformational
t10Endpoint protection that scores best in independent lab teststaildecision
t11Endpoint protection that stops fileless attacks running only in memorytaildecision
t12What drives the total cost of endpoint detection and response beyond the licence?tailinformational
t13Endpoint protection that keeps enough device history to investigate an attack weeks latertaildecision
t14Endpoint protection for managed service providers with monthly per-device billing for each clienttaildecision
t15How much does AI really improve endpoint detection, and where does it fall short?tailinformational
t16Endpoint protection that also covers company phones and tabletstaildecision
t17How can we test whether our endpoint protection would catch a real attack?tailinformational
t18Is it better to run one endpoint agent for everything or separate tools for prevention and detection?tailinformational
t19Endpoint protection that still supports older operating system versions their makers no longer updatetaildecision
t20Endpoint protection that detects attackers stealing saved passwords from a laptop's memorytaildecision

The 15 validation questions are never published.

10Data

  • Every answer: all 240 in full, with the searches each AI ran, the sites it found and cited, and the brands readCSVJSON
  • All 281 brands, every measureCSVJSON
  • The reportPDF

Licence: CC BY 4.0. Use and share with credit to Citewake.

11How to cite

APA
Citewake. (2026). Endpoint protection: what AI recommends, Citewake Edition 2 (collected 29–30 Oct 2026) (Edition 2) [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23792163
BibTeX
@techreport{citewake-ed2-endpoint-protection,
  author      = {{Citewake}},
  title       = {{Endpoint protection: what AI recommends, Citewake Edition 2 (collected 29–30 Oct 2026)}},
  institution = {Citewake},
  type        = {Edition 2, data set},
  year        = {2026},
  month       = oct,
  version     = {1},
  doi         = {10.5281/zenodo.23792163},
  url         = {https://citewake.com/editions/2/endpoint-protection},
  note        = {Licensed CC BY 4.0}
}

Version 1, published 30 October 2026. Published editions never change; corrections appear as new, dated versions.