Citewake

Made by OpenAI

ChatGPT

ChatGPT's models and how it answers buying questions: 140 models on OpenAI's list, and its answers reported gpt-6-luna.

1The model behind the answers

Requested
gpt-6-luna
Reported by the answers
gpt-6-luna
Last seen
28 October 2026

Requested: the model Citewake's calls asked for. Reported: the model string each response returned. A change in the reported string is recorded as observed.

2How it answers

Per answer28 October 2026Normal variation
Answers that searched the web100.0%±0.0 pts
Searches per answer3.7±0.2
Pages found per answer37.2±3.4
Pages cited per answer2.5±0.2
Brands named per answer2.4±0.3
Words per answer176±7

From the published editions' answers (178 questions and 178 answers on 28 October 2026). Normal variation is the same-model calibration floor.

Daily figures (1 day so far) are withheld until a day combines at least 5 different sites; they appear here once they do.

3How much does an answer change on its own?

The same AI asked the same questions in one edition and the next, on the same model. What moves here is the answer's own variation, the floor any claimed change has to clear.

Asked the same 178 questions a day apart on the same model (gpt-6-luna); on the 154 where it recommended something both times, ChatGPT kept the same first recommendation on 35.7% of them (90% interval 29.2% to 42.4%); on average 29.8% of its recommended brands were the same.

ChatGPT, Edition 0 to Edition 1
Edition 0 to Edition 1Edition 0Edition 1Change or share90% interval
Same first recommendation (154 questions)35.7%29.2% to 42.4%
Recommended brands in common (154 questions)29.8%26.1% to 33.9%
Brands named2.42.3-0.1-0.2 to +0.1
Words176178+3-2 to +8
Searched the web100.0%100.0%0.0 pts0.0 pts to 0.0 pts
Pages found37.238.2+1.0-0.1 to +2.1
Pages cited2.52.6+0.1-0.1 to +0.2

Pooled over 3 categories; the model gpt-6-luna as requested. Per answer means; changes are after minus before.

Link in bio tools that don't take a cut of my sales ChatGPT · 50.0% in common

Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended The Leap, Linktree, Beacons

If you mean no platform taking a percentage of each sale (you’ll still pay payment-processing fees, usually Stripe/PayPal), these are worth a look:

ToolPlatform cutCost / best for
The Leap0%Free plan; aimed at digital products. Stripe processing fees still apply. (theleap.co)
Stan Store0%$29/month or $99/month; a creator storefront with digital products, bookings, and more. Payment-processor fees still apply. (help.stan.store)
Linktree0% on ProPro is listed at $14/month billed annually, or $17 monthly. Lower plans may charge a platform fee on sales. (linktr.ee)
Beacons0% on higher tiersCreator Plus is $30/month; Free and Creator plans charge 9%. Processor fees still apply. (help.beacons.ai)

Quick picks: Try The Leap if you sell digital downloads and want to start free. Consider Stan if you want a broader creator storefront and are okay with a monthly subscription. Be sure to compare the monthly cost with any percentage fee you’d otherwise pay—the processor fee isn’t avoidable on these options.

The question page

Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended Taplink, Linktree, Beacons

If you mean no platform commission (not zero payment-processing fees), these are worth a look:

ToolPlatform fee on salesCost / catch
Taplink0%Payments require its Business plan; your payment provider may still charge processing fees. (taplink.at)
Linktree0%Selling paid digital products and bookings requires Pro: $14/month billed annually or $17 monthly. (linktr.ee)
Stan Store0%$29/month for Creator; Stripe or PayPal processing fees still apply. (help.stan.store)
Beacons0%Requires Creator Plus ($25/month billed annually or $30 monthly); Free and Creator take 9%. (beacons.ai)

Quick picks: Taplink if you want payment blocks on your page; Linktree for a simple bio page plus digital products; Stan if you want a storefront for digital products or services. “0%” means the platform doesn’t take a cut—it doesn’t waive Stripe/PayPal processing fees.

If you’re only linking to your own existing shop or checkout, a basic link-in-bio page may be enough: the sale happens elsewhere, so check that destination’s fees separately.

The question page

What are the best link in bio apps for creators? ChatGPT · 66.7% in common

Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended Linktree, Beacons, Stan Store, Carrd

There isn’t one best choice for everyone. My shortlist for creators:

AppBest forWhy choose it
LinktreeA simple, familiar link hubEasy to set up, has a free plan, and supports links, content embeds, analytics, and some selling tools. A solid default if you mainly need to direct followers to several destinations. (linktr.ee)
BeaconsAn all-in-one creator businessCombines a bio page with a store, email tools, media kit, and analytics. It has a free tier, but selling fees and features vary by plan—check the current plan details before choosing it for commerce. (home.beacons.ai)
Stan StoreSelling digital products, courses, or coachingMore of a mini-store than a basic link list, with checkout and creator-selling features. It’s a better fit if sales are the main job of your bio link; it’s paid after a trial. (uat.stan.store)
Later Link in BioInstagram/TikTok creators who want a clickable content feedLets you link posts to destinations, making it handy for sending viewers from specific posts to products or pages. Particularly appealing if you already use Later. (help.later.com)
CarrdA more custom-looking one-page siteWorth considering if you want something that feels like a small personal website rather than a standard stack of buttons.

Quick picks:

  • Just need a clean, easy link page: Linktree
  • Want bio page + creator tools in one place: Beacons
  • Primarily selling products or services: Stan Store
  • Want links tied to Instagram/TikTok posts: Later

Before committing, compare the transaction fee, custom-domain support, analytics, and branding removal on the plan you’d actually use—those details can matter more than the free tier. Prices and plan features can change, so verify them on the provider’s site before paying.

The question page

Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended Linktree, Beacons, Stan Store, Carrd, Later Link in Bio, Lnk.Bio

There isn’t one best link-in-bio app for every creator. The right pick depends on whether you mainly want to share links, sell, or build a mini-website.

AppBest forWhy consider it
LinktreeMost creators who want a straightforward link hubFamiliar, easy to set up, and has a free plan. A good default if you mostly need to route followers to your content and other profiles. (linktr.ee)
BeaconsCreators building a business around their pageCombines links with creator-focused tools such as selling products and collecting audience information. Check the sales fee on your chosen plan before committing. (paydm.app)
Stan StoreSelling digital products, courses, bookings, or coachingMore like a compact storefront than a simple list of links. It may suit you if selling is the main job of the page; it generally requires a paid plan. (paydm.app)
CarrdA more custom-looking, simple one-page siteOffers more page-design flexibility than a standard link list and can be a low-cost option for a polished landing page. (creatorstackclub.com)
Later Link in BioCreators already using Later to plan social postsConvenient if you want a link page alongside your scheduling workflow, rather than a separate creator-commerce platform. (paydm.app)
Lnk.BioKeeping costs lowWorth a look for a basic links page with inexpensive plan options. Compare its current limits and features with the free tiers of Linktree and Campsite.bio. (in.bio)

Quick picks: Start with Linktree for simple linking; choose Beacons for a broader creator hub; consider Stan Store if you’re actively selling; and look at Carrd if you want more control over the page’s design.

Before you choose, check three things on the current plan page: sales fees, custom-domain support, and which analytics are included. Pricing and plan features change, and a low subscription price can still come with transaction fees. (in.bio)

The question page

What are the best GEO tools? ChatGPT · 42.9% in common

Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Ahrefs Brand Radar, Profound, Peec AI, Otterly.AI, Writesonic GEO Suite

Assuming you mean generative engine optimization—tools for tracking how brands appear in ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, and similar systems—there isn’t one best tool for everyone. My shortlist:

ToolBest forWhy consider it
Semrush AI Visibility ToolkitTeams already using SemrushCombines AI visibility tracking, prompt research, competitor analysis, and sentiment with traditional SEO workflows. Listed at $99/month in Semrush’s current comparison. (semrush.com)
Ahrefs Brand RadarBroad discovery and competitor researchSearches a large index of AI responses and helps identify mentions, citations, and visibility gaps. Add custom prompts when you need to monitor specific questions. (help.ahrefs.com)
ProfoundEnterprise research and reportingA stronger fit when you want deep AI-search analytics and prompt intelligence—not just a simple mention tracker. (semrush.com)
Peec AIAgencies and growing teamsBuilt around multi-brand tracking, competitor benchmarking, and flexible project monitoring. (semrush.com)
Otterly.AIFreelancers and small teamsA relatively affordable way to track a defined set of prompts and citations; check add-on costs if you need more AI platforms. (semrush.com)
Writesonic GEO SuiteContent teams that want to act on findingsCombines AI visibility reporting with content and optimization workflows. (semrush.com)

Quick picks: Start with Otterly for basic, budget-conscious monitoring; choose Semrush if you want GEO alongside SEO; consider Ahrefs Brand Radar for broad discovery; and look at Profound or Peec for more extensive team or agency workflows.

One important caveat: GEO tools provide samples of AI answers, not a complete or perfectly stable ranking. Compare the same prompts, locations, and engines over time, and treat visibility metrics as directional. Ahrefs explicitly describes its data as sampling-based rather than real-time coverage of every AI response. (ahrefs.com)

The question page

Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended Ahrefs Brand Radar, Profound, Writesonic, Peec AI

If by GEO you mean generative engine optimization—tracking and improving how your brand appears in answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI—the best tool depends on whether you need broad research, ongoing monitoring, or help acting on the results.

ToolBest forWhy consider it
Semrush AI Visibility ToolkitBest all-around for teams already doing SEOCombines AI visibility tracking with SEO, competitor research, and content workflows. Its current toolkit starts at $99/month. (semrush.com)
Ahrefs Brand RadarBroad brand and citation researchUseful for benchmarking brands and finding cited pages and domains across AI answers and other channels. It also offers custom prompt tracking. (help.ahrefs.com)
ProfoundEnterprise teamsA fit for organizations that need deeper analytics and workflows across marketing, SEO, and PR. (semrush.com)
Otterly AISmall teams starting outA relatively accessible way to monitor AI mentions and citations; its entry plan is listed at $29/month. Check engine coverage on the plan you’re considering. (semrush.com)
WritesonicTeams that want tracking plus content workCombines visibility monitoring with content and optimization workflows, so teams can move from findings to updates in one platform. (semrush.com)
Peec AIAgencies and growing teamsWorth evaluating for project-based tracking and competitor benchmarking. (semrush.com)

My quick picks: Start with Semrush if you already use its SEO suite; try Otterly AI for a lower-cost monitoring entry point; evaluate Profound for enterprise needs; consider Ahrefs Brand Radar when broad discovery and citation research matter most.

One caveat: GEO tools measure samples of AI answers, not every private conversation or every result a user might see. Treat visibility scores as directional, and compare the same prompts, engines, and locations over time. (ahrefs.com)

If you tell me your budget, team size, and which AI platforms you need to track, I can narrow this to one or two.

The question page

Live tracking for a charity ride where supporters want to follow on their phones ChatGPT · 20.0% in common

Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended TrackTour, livedot

For a charity ride, I’d look at Map My Tracks first: it’s built for events and charities, with riders tracking from their phones and supporters following on an interactive map. It also offers event pages, sponsor features, and live timing. (mapmytracks.com)

Other options, depending on the setup:

  • TrackTour — a simpler event-focused option that says supporters can follow in a phone browser without downloading an app; it also supports donation links on participant profiles. (tracktour.app)
  • livedot / Windline — says it’s free for organizers and followers, with one event map supporters can open in a browser. Check phone compatibility before choosing: as of October 2026, its Android app is available, while its iPhone app is still under App Store review. (livedot.me)

Typical setup: riders enable location tracking on their phones; supporters open a shared link to watch the map. Test it on the route beforehand, make sure riders know when their location is visible, and plan for battery life and stretches with poor cell service. If you tell me roughly how many riders you have and whether you need a free option, I can narrow this down.

The question page

Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended TraQCentral, Map My Tracks, RaceJoy, livedot

For an organized charity ride, I’d look at TraQCentral first if safety and ride-day coordination matter alongside supporter tracking. Riders can share progress on personalized web pages, while organizers can see rider locations, support vehicles, and incidents in a central dashboard. (traq-central.com)

Other options, depending on what you need:

  • Map My Tracks — a fuller event platform with live maps, participant tracking, checkpoint/finish timing, and event pages. Riders use a phone app; supporters can follow through the event experience. (mapmytracks.com)
  • RaceJoy — worth checking for a simpler rider-and-supporter experience with live maps, progress alerts, and cheers. It’s been used at charity rides, though confirm it fits your event and current setup. (lowvelo.org)
  • livedot / Windline — supporters follow through a browser link, with no app or account required on their end. Important caveat: as of October 2026, its cycling app is available on Android, while its iPhone app is still under review. (livedot.me)

Practical recommendation: choose based on what riders and supporters must install, whether the public can follow without an account, and whether organizers need an incident/SAG dashboard—not just a map. Test with a few riders on both iPhone and Android before ride day, since phone battery, cell coverage, and background-location permissions can affect tracking.

If you share the approximate rider count and whether this is a one-day event or a solo fundraiser, I can narrow the options down.

The question page

Best live tracking for cycling events ChatGPT · 50.0% in common

Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended Tour Tracker, Map My Tracks, RaceJoy

“Best” depends on whether you mean watching a pro race or tracking riders in an event:

  • For pro races: Tour Tracker is a strong pick for interactive maps, GPS tracking, race profiles, and live race coverage for major tours and selected races. Coverage varies by event. (thetourtracker.com)
  • For a participant’s event ride: Use the event’s official tracker if it has one—tracking availability and accuracy depend on what the organizer provides. In the U.S., RTRT.me is one example used by events for rider tracking. (pmc.org)
  • For a club or event organizer setting up tracking: Map My Tracks offers an event platform with live maps and spectator tracking. (mapmytracks.com)
  • For tracking one rider from a phone: RaceJoy supports cycling events, but the event needs to offer it and the rider must enable tracking. (racejoy.net)

Quick recommendation: For the Tour de France or other major pro races, try Tour Tracker. For a local race or gran fondo, check the event website first and use its official tracker.

The question page

Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna

Recommended RaceJoy, Tour Tracker, RaceMyRace

“Best” depends on whether you mean following a race or tracking someone riding in an event:

  • For tracking a participant in a supported event: RaceJoy is a strong all-round choice, if the event offers it. Spectators can follow riders on a course map; participants need to carry a phone and enable GPS tracking. Some events also offer chip-based tracking. (racejoy.net)
  • For following professional races: Tour Tracker offers interactive course maps and GPS tracking for major races it covers. (thetourtracker.com)
  • For organizers choosing a tracking system: Start with the event’s timing provider. Tools such as RaceJoy and RaceMyRace can connect participant tracking with event maps and timing systems. (info.runsignup.com)

Quick pick: For a participant event, use whatever official tracking app the organizer specifies; if you’re choosing among options, try RaceJoy. For pro cycling, try Tour Tracker. Where accuracy is important, check whether tracking is GPS-based or chip-based—phone tracking depends on the rider carrying a charged phone and having coverage.

The question page

4Changes

No changes recorded for ChatGPT yet. Events appear here as soon as any are recorded: the register reads each provider's model list every day, the model each answer reports, and how the answers behave.

5OpenAI's model list

140 listed, read daily from GET https://api.openai.com/v1/models since 29 October 2026. Models already listed on the first day are the baseline, not new. Lifecycle dates are shown only where the list itself gives them.

All 140 models
ModelFirst seenLifecycleStatus
babbage-00229 October 2026shutdown 2026-09-28listed
chat-latest29 October 2026–listed
chatgpt-image-latest29 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-01listed
davinci-00229 October 2026shutdown 2026-09-28listed
gpt-3.5-turbo29 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-3.5-turbo-012529 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-3.5-turbo-110629 October 2026shutdown 2026-09-28listed
gpt-3.5-turbo-16k29 October 2026–listed
gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct29 October 2026shutdown 2026-09-28listed
gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct-091429 October 2026–listed
gpt-429 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4-061329 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4-turbo29 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-0929 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4.129 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4.1-2025-04-1429 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4.1-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-1429 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4.1-nano29 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-1429 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4o29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4o-2024-05-1329 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-4o-2024-08-0629 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4o-2024-11-2029 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4o-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-1829 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-14listed
gpt-4o-mini-search-preview29 October 2026–listed
gpt-4o-mini-search-preview-2025-03-1129 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-4o-mini-transcribe29 October 2026shutdown 2027-02-26listed
gpt-4o-mini-transcribe-2025-03-2029 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-4o-mini-transcribe-2025-12-1529 October 2026shutdown 2027-02-26listed
gpt-4o-mini-tts29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-06listed
gpt-4o-mini-tts-2025-03-2029 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-06listed
gpt-4o-mini-tts-2025-12-1529 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-06listed
gpt-4o-search-preview29 October 2026–listed
gpt-4o-search-preview-2025-03-1129 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-4o-transcribe29 October 2026shutdown 2027-02-26listed
gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize29 October 2026shutdown 2027-02-26listed
gpt-529 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-2025-08-0729 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-chat-latest29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5-codex29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-0729 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-nano29 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-nano-2025-08-0729 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-pro29 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-pro-2025-10-0629 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
gpt-5-search-api29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5-search-api-2025-10-1429 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.129 October 2026shutdown 2027-04-01listed
gpt-5.1-2025-11-1329 October 2026shutdown 2027-04-01listed
gpt-5.1-chat-latest29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5.1-codex29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5.1-codex-max29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5.1-codex-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5.229 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.2-2025-12-1129 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.2-chat-latest29 October 2026shutdown 2026-08-10listed
gpt-5.2-codex29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-5.2-pro29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.2-pro-2025-12-1129 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.3-chat-latest29 October 2026shutdown 2026-08-10listed
gpt-5.3-codex29 October 2026shutdown 2027-04-01listed
gpt-5.429 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.4-2026-03-0529 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.4-mini29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-1729 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.4-nano29 October 2026shutdown 2027-04-01listed
gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-1729 October 2026shutdown 2027-04-01listed
gpt-5.4-pro29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-0529 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.529 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.5-2026-04-2329 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.5-pro29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-2329 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.6-luna29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.6-sol29 October 2026–listed
gpt-5.6-terra29 October 2026–listed
gpt-6-astra29 October 2026–listed
gpt-6-luna29 October 2026–listed
gpt-6-sol29 October 2026–listed
gpt-6.1-sol29 October 2026–listed
gpt-6.1-terra29 October 2026–listed
gpt-audio29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-audio-1.529 October 2026–listed
gpt-audio-2025-08-2829 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-audio-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-audio-mini-2025-10-0629 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
gpt-audio-mini-2025-12-1529 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-image-129 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
gpt-image-1-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-01listed
gpt-image-1.529 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-01listed
gpt-image-229 October 2026–listed
gpt-image-2-2026-04-2129 October 2026–listed
gpt-image-2.5-flare29 October 2026–listed
gpt-image-2.5-flare-2026-09-0829 October 2026–listed
gpt-image-2.5-sunburst29 October 2026–listed
gpt-image-2.5-sunburst-2026-09-0829 October 2026–listed
gpt-live-129 October 2026–listed
gpt-live-transcribe29 October 2026–listed
gpt-realtime29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-realtime-1.529 October 2026–listed
gpt-realtime-229 October 2026–listed
gpt-realtime-2.129 October 2026–listed
gpt-realtime-2.1-mini29 October 2026–listed
gpt-realtime-2025-08-2829 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-realtime-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-realtime-mini-2025-12-1529 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-20listed
gpt-realtime-translate29 October 2026–listed
gpt-realtime-whisper29 October 2026–listed
gpt-transcribe29 October 2026–listed
o129 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o1-2024-12-1729 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o1-pro29 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o1-pro-2025-03-1929 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o329 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
o3-2025-04-1629 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
o3-deep-research29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
o3-deep-research-2025-06-2629 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
o3-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o3-mini-2025-01-3129 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o3-pro29 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
o3-pro-2025-06-1029 October 2026shutdown 2026-12-11listed
o4-mini29 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o4-mini-2025-04-1629 October 2026shutdown 2026-10-23listed
o4-mini-deep-research29 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
o4-mini-deep-research-2025-06-2629 October 2026shutdown 2026-07-23listed
omni-moderation-2024-09-2629 October 2026–listed
omni-moderation-latest29 October 2026–listed
sora-229 October 2026shutdown 2026-09-24listed
sora-2-pro29 October 2026shutdown 2026-09-24listed
text-embedding-3-large29 October 2026–listed
text-embedding-3-small29 October 2026–listed
text-embedding-ada-00229 October 2026–listed
tts-129 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-06listed
tts-1-110629 October 2026–listed
tts-1-hd29 October 2026shutdown 2027-01-06listed
tts-1-hd-110629 October 2026–listed
whisper-129 October 2026shutdown 2027-02-26listed