Made by OpenAI
ChatGPT
ChatGPT's models and how it answers buying questions: 140 models on OpenAI's list, and its answers reported gpt-6-luna.
1The model behind the answers
Requested: the model Citewake's calls asked for. Reported: the model string each response returned. A change in the reported string is recorded as observed.
2How it answers
| Per answer | 28 October 2026 | Normal variation |
|---|---|---|
| Answers that searched the web | 100.0% | ±0.0 pts |
| Searches per answer | 3.7 | ±0.2 |
| Pages found per answer | 37.2 | ±3.4 |
| Pages cited per answer | 2.5 | ±0.2 |
| Brands named per answer | 2.4 | ±0.3 |
| Words per answer | 176 | ±7 |
From the published editions' answers (178 questions and 178 answers on 28 October 2026). Normal variation is the same-model calibration floor.
Daily figures (1 day so far) are withheld until a day combines at least 5 different sites; they appear here once they do.
3How much does an answer change on its own?
The same AI asked the same questions in one edition and the next, on the same model. What moves here is the answer's own variation, the floor any claimed change has to clear.
Asked the same 178 questions a day apart on the same model (gpt-6-luna); on the 154 where it recommended something both times, ChatGPT kept the same first recommendation on 35.7% of them (90% interval 29.2% to 42.4%); on average 29.8% of its recommended brands were the same.
| Edition 0 to Edition 1 | Edition 0 | Edition 1 | Change or share | 90% interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same first recommendation (154 questions) | 35.7% | 29.2% to 42.4% | ||
| Recommended brands in common (154 questions) | 29.8% | 26.1% to 33.9% | ||
| Brands named | 2.4 | 2.3 | -0.1 | -0.2 to +0.1 |
| Words | 176 | 178 | +3 | -2 to +8 |
| Searched the web | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0 pts | 0.0 pts to 0.0 pts |
| Pages found | 37.2 | 38.2 | +1.0 | -0.1 to +2.1 |
| Pages cited | 2.5 | 2.6 | +0.1 | -0.1 to +0.2 |
Pooled over 3 categories; the model gpt-6-luna as requested. Per answer means; changes are after minus before.
Link in bio tools that don't take a cut of my sales ChatGPT · 50.0% in common
Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended The Leap, Linktree, Beacons
If you mean no platform taking a percentage of each sale (you’ll still pay payment-processing fees, usually Stripe/PayPal), these are worth a look:
| Tool | Platform cut | Cost / best for |
|---|---|---|
| The Leap | 0% | Free plan; aimed at digital products. Stripe processing fees still apply. (theleap.co) |
| Stan Store | 0% | $29/month or $99/month; a creator storefront with digital products, bookings, and more. Payment-processor fees still apply. (help.stan.store) |
| Linktree | 0% on Pro | Pro is listed at $14/month billed annually, or $17 monthly. Lower plans may charge a platform fee on sales. (linktr.ee) |
| Beacons | 0% on higher tiers | Creator Plus is $30/month; Free and Creator plans charge 9%. Processor fees still apply. (help.beacons.ai) |
Quick picks: Try The Leap if you sell digital downloads and want to start free. Consider Stan if you want a broader creator storefront and are okay with a monthly subscription. Be sure to compare the monthly cost with any percentage fee you’d otherwise pay—the processor fee isn’t avoidable on these options.
Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended Taplink, Linktree, Beacons
If you mean no platform commission (not zero payment-processing fees), these are worth a look:
| Tool | Platform fee on sales | Cost / catch |
|---|---|---|
| Taplink | 0% | Payments require its Business plan; your payment provider may still charge processing fees. (taplink.at) |
| Linktree | 0% | Selling paid digital products and bookings requires Pro: $14/month billed annually or $17 monthly. (linktr.ee) |
| Stan Store | 0% | $29/month for Creator; Stripe or PayPal processing fees still apply. (help.stan.store) |
| Beacons | 0% | Requires Creator Plus ($25/month billed annually or $30 monthly); Free and Creator take 9%. (beacons.ai) |
Quick picks: Taplink if you want payment blocks on your page; Linktree for a simple bio page plus digital products; Stan if you want a storefront for digital products or services. “0%” means the platform doesn’t take a cut—it doesn’t waive Stripe/PayPal processing fees.
If you’re only linking to your own existing shop or checkout, a basic link-in-bio page may be enough: the sale happens elsewhere, so check that destination’s fees separately.
What are the best link in bio apps for creators? ChatGPT · 66.7% in common
Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended Linktree, Beacons, Stan Store, Carrd
There isn’t one best choice for everyone. My shortlist for creators:
| App | Best for | Why choose it |
|---|---|---|
| Linktree | A simple, familiar link hub | Easy to set up, has a free plan, and supports links, content embeds, analytics, and some selling tools. A solid default if you mainly need to direct followers to several destinations. (linktr.ee) |
| Beacons | An all-in-one creator business | Combines a bio page with a store, email tools, media kit, and analytics. It has a free tier, but selling fees and features vary by plan—check the current plan details before choosing it for commerce. (home.beacons.ai) |
| Stan Store | Selling digital products, courses, or coaching | More of a mini-store than a basic link list, with checkout and creator-selling features. It’s a better fit if sales are the main job of your bio link; it’s paid after a trial. (uat.stan.store) |
| Later Link in Bio | Instagram/TikTok creators who want a clickable content feed | Lets you link posts to destinations, making it handy for sending viewers from specific posts to products or pages. Particularly appealing if you already use Later. (help.later.com) |
| Carrd | A more custom-looking one-page site | Worth considering if you want something that feels like a small personal website rather than a standard stack of buttons. |
Quick picks:
- Just need a clean, easy link page: Linktree
- Want bio page + creator tools in one place: Beacons
- Primarily selling products or services: Stan Store
- Want links tied to Instagram/TikTok posts: Later
Before committing, compare the transaction fee, custom-domain support, analytics, and branding removal on the plan you’d actually use—those details can matter more than the free tier. Prices and plan features can change, so verify them on the provider’s site before paying.
Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended Linktree, Beacons, Stan Store, Carrd, Later Link in Bio, Lnk.Bio
There isn’t one best link-in-bio app for every creator. The right pick depends on whether you mainly want to share links, sell, or build a mini-website.
| App | Best for | Why consider it |
|---|---|---|
| Linktree | Most creators who want a straightforward link hub | Familiar, easy to set up, and has a free plan. A good default if you mostly need to route followers to your content and other profiles. (linktr.ee) |
| Beacons | Creators building a business around their page | Combines links with creator-focused tools such as selling products and collecting audience information. Check the sales fee on your chosen plan before committing. (paydm.app) |
| Stan Store | Selling digital products, courses, bookings, or coaching | More like a compact storefront than a simple list of links. It may suit you if selling is the main job of the page; it generally requires a paid plan. (paydm.app) |
| Carrd | A more custom-looking, simple one-page site | Offers more page-design flexibility than a standard link list and can be a low-cost option for a polished landing page. (creatorstackclub.com) |
| Later Link in Bio | Creators already using Later to plan social posts | Convenient if you want a link page alongside your scheduling workflow, rather than a separate creator-commerce platform. (paydm.app) |
| Lnk.Bio | Keeping costs low | Worth a look for a basic links page with inexpensive plan options. Compare its current limits and features with the free tiers of Linktree and Campsite.bio. (in.bio) |
Quick picks: Start with Linktree for simple linking; choose Beacons for a broader creator hub; consider Stan Store if you’re actively selling; and look at Carrd if you want more control over the page’s design.
Before you choose, check three things on the current plan page: sales fees, custom-domain support, and which analytics are included. Pricing and plan features change, and a low subscription price can still come with transaction fees. (in.bio)
What are the best GEO tools? ChatGPT · 42.9% in common
Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Ahrefs Brand Radar, Profound, Peec AI, Otterly.AI, Writesonic GEO Suite
Assuming you mean generative engine optimization—tools for tracking how brands appear in ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, and similar systems—there isn’t one best tool for everyone. My shortlist:
| Tool | Best for | Why consider it |
|---|---|---|
| Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit | Teams already using Semrush | Combines AI visibility tracking, prompt research, competitor analysis, and sentiment with traditional SEO workflows. Listed at $99/month in Semrush’s current comparison. (semrush.com) |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Broad discovery and competitor research | Searches a large index of AI responses and helps identify mentions, citations, and visibility gaps. Add custom prompts when you need to monitor specific questions. (help.ahrefs.com) |
| Profound | Enterprise research and reporting | A stronger fit when you want deep AI-search analytics and prompt intelligence—not just a simple mention tracker. (semrush.com) |
| Peec AI | Agencies and growing teams | Built around multi-brand tracking, competitor benchmarking, and flexible project monitoring. (semrush.com) |
| Otterly.AI | Freelancers and small teams | A relatively affordable way to track a defined set of prompts and citations; check add-on costs if you need more AI platforms. (semrush.com) |
| Writesonic GEO Suite | Content teams that want to act on findings | Combines AI visibility reporting with content and optimization workflows. (semrush.com) |
Quick picks: Start with Otterly for basic, budget-conscious monitoring; choose Semrush if you want GEO alongside SEO; consider Ahrefs Brand Radar for broad discovery; and look at Profound or Peec for more extensive team or agency workflows.
One important caveat: GEO tools provide samples of AI answers, not a complete or perfectly stable ranking. Compare the same prompts, locations, and engines over time, and treat visibility metrics as directional. Ahrefs explicitly describes its data as sampling-based rather than real-time coverage of every AI response. (ahrefs.com)
Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended Ahrefs Brand Radar, Profound, Writesonic, Peec AI
If by GEO you mean generative engine optimization—tracking and improving how your brand appears in answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI—the best tool depends on whether you need broad research, ongoing monitoring, or help acting on the results.
| Tool | Best for | Why consider it |
|---|---|---|
| Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit | Best all-around for teams already doing SEO | Combines AI visibility tracking with SEO, competitor research, and content workflows. Its current toolkit starts at $99/month. (semrush.com) |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Broad brand and citation research | Useful for benchmarking brands and finding cited pages and domains across AI answers and other channels. It also offers custom prompt tracking. (help.ahrefs.com) |
| Profound | Enterprise teams | A fit for organizations that need deeper analytics and workflows across marketing, SEO, and PR. (semrush.com) |
| Otterly AI | Small teams starting out | A relatively accessible way to monitor AI mentions and citations; its entry plan is listed at $29/month. Check engine coverage on the plan you’re considering. (semrush.com) |
| Writesonic | Teams that want tracking plus content work | Combines visibility monitoring with content and optimization workflows, so teams can move from findings to updates in one platform. (semrush.com) |
| Peec AI | Agencies and growing teams | Worth evaluating for project-based tracking and competitor benchmarking. (semrush.com) |
My quick picks: Start with Semrush if you already use its SEO suite; try Otterly AI for a lower-cost monitoring entry point; evaluate Profound for enterprise needs; consider Ahrefs Brand Radar when broad discovery and citation research matter most.
One caveat: GEO tools measure samples of AI answers, not every private conversation or every result a user might see. Treat visibility scores as directional, and compare the same prompts, engines, and locations over time. (ahrefs.com)
If you tell me your budget, team size, and which AI platforms you need to track, I can narrow this to one or two.
Live tracking for a charity ride where supporters want to follow on their phones ChatGPT · 20.0% in common
Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended TrackTour, livedot
For a charity ride, I’d look at Map My Tracks first: it’s built for events and charities, with riders tracking from their phones and supporters following on an interactive map. It also offers event pages, sponsor features, and live timing. (mapmytracks.com)
Other options, depending on the setup:
- TrackTour — a simpler event-focused option that says supporters can follow in a phone browser without downloading an app; it also supports donation links on participant profiles. (tracktour.app)
- livedot / Windline — says it’s free for organizers and followers, with one event map supporters can open in a browser. Check phone compatibility before choosing: as of October 2026, its Android app is available, while its iPhone app is still under App Store review. (livedot.me)
Typical setup: riders enable location tracking on their phones; supporters open a shared link to watch the map. Test it on the route beforehand, make sure riders know when their location is visible, and plan for battery life and stretches with poor cell service. If you tell me roughly how many riders you have and whether you need a free option, I can narrow this down.
Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended TraQCentral, Map My Tracks, RaceJoy, livedot
For an organized charity ride, I’d look at TraQCentral first if safety and ride-day coordination matter alongside supporter tracking. Riders can share progress on personalized web pages, while organizers can see rider locations, support vehicles, and incidents in a central dashboard. (traq-central.com)
Other options, depending on what you need:
- Map My Tracks — a fuller event platform with live maps, participant tracking, checkpoint/finish timing, and event pages. Riders use a phone app; supporters can follow through the event experience. (mapmytracks.com)
- RaceJoy — worth checking for a simpler rider-and-supporter experience with live maps, progress alerts, and cheers. It’s been used at charity rides, though confirm it fits your event and current setup. (lowvelo.org)
- livedot / Windline — supporters follow through a browser link, with no app or account required on their end. Important caveat: as of October 2026, its cycling app is available on Android, while its iPhone app is still under review. (livedot.me)
Practical recommendation: choose based on what riders and supporters must install, whether the public can follow without an account, and whether organizers need an incident/SAG dashboard—not just a map. Test with a few riders on both iPhone and Android before ride day, since phone battery, cell coverage, and background-location permissions can affect tracking.
If you share the approximate rider count and whether this is a one-day event or a solo fundraiser, I can narrow the options down.
Best live tracking for cycling events ChatGPT · 50.0% in common
Edition 0 · 28 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended Tour Tracker, Map My Tracks, RaceJoy
“Best” depends on whether you mean watching a pro race or tracking riders in an event:
- For pro races: Tour Tracker is a strong pick for interactive maps, GPS tracking, race profiles, and live race coverage for major tours and selected races. Coverage varies by event. (thetourtracker.com)
- For a participant’s event ride: Use the event’s official tracker if it has one—tracking availability and accuracy depend on what the organizer provides. In the U.S., RTRT.me is one example used by events for rider tracking. (pmc.org)
- For a club or event organizer setting up tracking: Map My Tracks offers an event platform with live maps and spectator tracking. (mapmytracks.com)
- For tracking one rider from a phone: RaceJoy supports cycling events, but the event needs to offer it and the rider must enable tracking. (racejoy.net)
Quick recommendation: For the Tour de France or other major pro races, try Tour Tracker. For a local race or gran fondo, check the event website first and use its official tracker.
Edition 1 · 29 October 2026 · gpt-6-luna
Recommended RaceJoy, Tour Tracker, RaceMyRace
“Best” depends on whether you mean following a race or tracking someone riding in an event:
- For tracking a participant in a supported event: RaceJoy is a strong all-round choice, if the event offers it. Spectators can follow riders on a course map; participants need to carry a phone and enable GPS tracking. Some events also offer chip-based tracking. (racejoy.net)
- For following professional races: Tour Tracker offers interactive course maps and GPS tracking for major races it covers. (thetourtracker.com)
- For organizers choosing a tracking system: Start with the event’s timing provider. Tools such as RaceJoy and RaceMyRace can connect participant tracking with event maps and timing systems. (info.runsignup.com)
Quick pick: For a participant event, use whatever official tracking app the organizer specifies; if you’re choosing among options, try RaceJoy. For pro cycling, try Tour Tracker. Where accuracy is important, check whether tracking is GPS-based or chip-based—phone tracking depends on the rider carrying a charged phone and having coverage.
4Changes
No changes recorded for ChatGPT yet. Events appear here as soon as any are recorded: the register reads each provider's model list every day, the model each answer reports, and how the answers behave.
5OpenAI's model list
140 listed, read daily from GET https://api.openai.com/v1/models since 29 October 2026. Models already listed on the first day are the baseline, not new. Lifecycle dates are shown only where the list itself gives them.
All 140 models
| Model | First seen | Lifecycle | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| babbage-002 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-09-28 | listed |
| chat-latest | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| chatgpt-image-latest | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-01 | listed |
| davinci-002 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-09-28 | listed |
| gpt-3.5-turbo | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-3.5-turbo-0125 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-09-28 | listed |
| gpt-3.5-turbo-16k | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-09-28 | listed |
| gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct-0914 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-4 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4-0613 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4-turbo | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4.1 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4.1-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-14 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4.1-nano | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4o | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4o-2024-05-13 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-4o-2024-08-06 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4o-2024-11-20 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-14 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-search-preview | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-search-preview-2025-03-11 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-transcribe | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-02-26 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-transcribe-2025-03-20 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-transcribe-2025-12-15 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-02-26 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-tts | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-06 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-tts-2025-03-20 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-06 | listed |
| gpt-4o-mini-tts-2025-12-15 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-06 | listed |
| gpt-4o-search-preview | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-4o-search-preview-2025-03-11 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-4o-transcribe | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-02-26 | listed |
| gpt-4o-transcribe-diarize | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-02-26 | listed |
| gpt-5 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-2025-08-07 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-chat-latest | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5-codex | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-nano | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-pro | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-pro-2025-10-06 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| gpt-5-search-api | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5-search-api-2025-10-14 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.1 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-04-01 | listed |
| gpt-5.1-2025-11-13 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-04-01 | listed |
| gpt-5.1-chat-latest | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5.1-codex | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5.1-codex-max | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5.1-codex-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5.2 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.2-2025-12-11 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.2-chat-latest | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-08-10 | listed |
| gpt-5.2-codex | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-5.2-pro | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.2-pro-2025-12-11 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.3-chat-latest | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-08-10 | listed |
| gpt-5.3-codex | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-04-01 | listed |
| gpt-5.4 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.4-mini | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.4-nano | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-04-01 | listed |
| gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-04-01 | listed |
| gpt-5.4-pro | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.4-pro-2026-03-05 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.5 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.5-2026-04-23 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.5-pro | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.5-pro-2026-04-23 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.6-luna | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.6-sol | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-5.6-terra | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-6-astra | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-6-luna | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-6-sol | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-6.1-sol | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-6.1-terra | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-audio | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-audio-1.5 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-audio-2025-08-28 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-audio-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-audio-mini-2025-10-06 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| gpt-audio-mini-2025-12-15 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-image-1 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| gpt-image-1-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-01 | listed |
| gpt-image-1.5 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-01 | listed |
| gpt-image-2 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-image-2-2026-04-21 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-image-2.5-flare | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-image-2.5-flare-2026-09-08 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-image-2.5-sunburst | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-image-2.5-sunburst-2026-09-08 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-live-1 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-live-transcribe | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-realtime | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-realtime-1.5 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-realtime-2 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-realtime-2.1 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-realtime-2.1-mini | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-realtime-2025-08-28 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-realtime-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-realtime-mini-2025-12-15 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-20 | listed |
| gpt-realtime-translate | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-realtime-whisper | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| gpt-transcribe | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| o1 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o1-2024-12-17 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o1-pro | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o1-pro-2025-03-19 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o3 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| o3-2025-04-16 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| o3-deep-research | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| o3-deep-research-2025-06-26 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| o3-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o3-mini-2025-01-31 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o3-pro | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| o3-pro-2025-06-10 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-12-11 | listed |
| o4-mini | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o4-mini-2025-04-16 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-10-23 | listed |
| o4-mini-deep-research | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| o4-mini-deep-research-2025-06-26 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-07-23 | listed |
| omni-moderation-2024-09-26 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| omni-moderation-latest | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| sora-2 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-09-24 | listed |
| sora-2-pro | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2026-09-24 | listed |
| text-embedding-3-large | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| text-embedding-3-small | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| text-embedding-ada-002 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| tts-1 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-06 | listed |
| tts-1-1106 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| tts-1-hd | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-01-06 | listed |
| tts-1-hd-1106 | 29 October 2026 | – | listed |
| whisper-1 | 29 October 2026 | shutdown 2027-02-26 | listed |