Website builder that copes with a site of several hundred pages

For a site with several hundred pages, choose a CMS that generates pages from reusable templates, rather than building every page separately.

• Easiest visual-builder option: Wix Studio. Its CMS can create many URL-specific pages from a dynamic-page template. Note that Wix Studio lists a limit of 100 static pages; dynamic pages are the practical route for a large content section. (support.wix.com)
• Best flexible all-rounder: WordPress. A good fit if you want lots of content types, plugins, and room to grow; it takes more care to set up and maintain.
• Webflow: capable when most pages are CMS-driven, but check its static-page and CMS-item limits against your plan before committing. Its current pricing lists CMS-item limits by plan. (webflow.com)

Quick recommendation: If you want a polished visual builder and your pages share a few layouts, try Wix Studio. If you expect the site to keep growing or need more control, consider WordPress.

The key question: are these hundreds of pages mostly similar records—like locations, products, or articles—or individually designed pages?

For a site of several hundred pages, the best fit is usually WordPress or a dedicated CMS, not a drag-and-drop hosted builder. Hosted builders can work, but their page limits and navigation depth are the constraints to check.

Hosted builders (check plan limits first)

• Squarespace: One review says sites can hold about 1,000 pages, storage and bandwidth are unlimited. The same source notes page speed is a recurring complaint. Another reviewer warns against it for larger websites (30+ individual pages) due to the limited depth of the navigation (only one-sub level).
• Duda: Its entry plan lists a 1,000-page cap, and reviewers say it impresses with flexible design options and practical tools for client work, but it is significantly more expensive than other builders.
• Weebly: One reviewer says that for sites over 30 pages, Weebly has a better system in place to manage a large set of pages.
• Wix: Reviews conflict. One says it is not ideal for larger websites, while another describes Wix Studio as a strong option for larger teams and agencies.
• Strikingly: Its Pro plan caps sites at up to 100 pages per site, so it is likely too small here.

WordPress (self-hosted or managed)
This is the most common answer for several hundred pages. One source says WordPress gives you complete control and ownership over your site, and that you can easily export all your information and move to a new hosting provider. Page count is not a practical limit, but performance, plugins, and hosting become your responsibility. Pairing it with a page builder such as Elementor or Beaver Builder helps with layout. Reviewers note the caveat that you'll need to manage performance as your site grows.

Enterprise-grade CMSs (more technical)

• Drupal: Reviewers describe it as something that easily scales to handle large, complex websites with thousands of pages. It needs developer support.
• Wagtail: An open-source option designed with the needs of large organisations who produce high quantities of content in mind, built on Python.
• TYPO3: Suited to multi-language, multi-site setups; one source calls it best for large international companies managing multiple websites and intranets in different languages.

My recommendation: If you want a managed, low-effort option and the site is mostly static content, check whether a hosted builder's plan supports your page count and navigation depth. Otherwise, choose WordPress for the easiest path, or Drupal or Wagtail if you need complex structure, workflows, or a developer team. Before committing, confirm the current page limits and navigation depth on each plan, since these change often.

Managing a website with several hundred pages requires a shift in how you think about "website builders." While many platforms offer drag-and-drop interfaces, once you exceed 50–100 pages, the traditional approach of manually designing every page becomes inefficient and difficult to maintain.

To handle a site of this scale, you should prioritize platforms that support Content Management Systems (CMS) and dynamic, data-driven page creation.

Recommended Approaches

1. The "Dynamic/CMS" Approach (Best for Builders like Wix or Webflow)

If you prefer a visual, all-in-one builder, you must move away from "static" design.

• Wix (Wix Studio): While standard Wix sites have limits, Wix Studio and its robust CMS allow you to create "Dynamic Pages." You design a single template, and the CMS populates it with content from a database (spreadsheet). This allows you to have hundreds or thousands of pages without needing to build each one individually.
• Webflow: Highly regarded for its "CMS Collections," Webflow is built for data-driven sites. You create a structure for your content (e.g., "Articles," "Team Members," "Product Pages"), and the platform automatically generates the pages for you. It is more technical than Wix but offers superior design control and performance for large sites.

2. The CMS Approach (Best for Long-Term Scalability: WordPress)

For a site with hundreds of pages, WordPress is the industry standard for a reason.

• Scalability: WordPress does not have an arbitrary "page limit." It is built to manage thousands of posts and pages, and it handles large content volumes better than most closed-system builders.
• Flexibility: With plugins like Elementor Pro, you get the visual, drag-and-drop experience of a website builder, but you retain the power of a true CMS. You can use "Theme Builder" features to create templates that apply to hundreds of pages at once, making global updates (like changing a footer or sidebar) instantaneous.
• Ownership: Unlike proprietary builders, your site is portable. You own your data, your hosting, and your design, which is a major advantage when managing large amounts of content over several years.

Comparison at a Glance

Key Considerations for Large Sites

• Avoid "Static" Design: If you are still manually dragging and dropping elements for every single page, stop. Any platform you choose should offer a CMS/Database feature where you define a template once and plug in your content.
• Navigation & Architecture: With hundreds of pages, your primary challenge will be user experience (UX) and navigation. Ensure the builder has strong "filtering" or "search" functionality so users can find the specific content they need.
• SEO Management: Large sites live or die by SEO. Ensure your platform allows for bulk editing of metadata and schema markup, rather than requiring you to open every single page to update a title tag.

Summary Verdict

• If you want a balance of simplicity and scale: Use Wix Studio or Webflow, but ensure you fully learn their CMS/Dynamic Page features. Do not attempt to build 200+ pages manually.
• If you are planning for long-term growth or SEO is a priority: Choose WordPress. It is the most robust way to manage hundreds of pages, and while it requires more initial setup and maintenance, it will not "hit a wall" as your site grows.

For a site with several hundred pages, WordPress is the safest all-round choice if you’re comfortable with hosting or hiring someone to manage it. It has no built-in page-count ceiling; practical limits depend on hosting, performance setup, and how the content is organized. ¹²¹⁴

If you want a more guided, no-code builder, consider Wix with its CMS: it supports up to 100 static pages, plus dynamic pages that generate many URLs from CMS items. That works well when lots of pages share a template—such as staff profiles, locations, or a resource library. Wix’s overall page quota is 298, so check the details if you expect many separately designed pages. ¹⁷

Webflow is another option, especially for design control, but its standard paid plans allow up to 150 static pages; exceeding that may require Enterprise. Its CMS can handle large numbers of content items, but those are template-driven pages rather than individually built static pages. ²¹¹

Quick pick: WordPress for several hundred distinct pages; Wix CMS or Webflow if most pages can be generated from a reusable template.